LET Cat1

 

LET Cat1 Make up for the Vacancy of NB-IoT and 5G

 

What is the use of LTE Cat1? Build cat1 based on 4G LTE to make up for the vacancy of NB-IoT and 5G.

LTE Cat1

LTE Cat1

From the current development trend of the cellular Internet of Things, the opportunity for LTE Cat1 to assume the main role of 4G Internet of Things connection has already begun.

Among them, Category 1 is the user terminal level of the lowest version of the parameter configuration, allowing the industry to design “low version” 4G terminals at low cost, generally referred to as LTE Cat1.

Therefore, the development of the LTE Cat1 network and related industries is of great significance to complement the main scenarios of the Internet of Things.

However, the current NB-IoT industry ecosystem is ready, and if LTE Cat1 can currently exert its strength, it is indeed a better opportunity to promote the intergenerational migration of cellular IoT.

GSMA future network experts have repeatedly reminded the industry at industry summits: Although 5G has attracted much attention, 4G will still occupy the largest share until 2025.

For the Internet of Things, in the next few years, 4G will not only take a large share of cellular Internet of Things connections, but also the main source of revenue for operators.

However, the 4G Internet of Things connection also has obvious structural features, and LTE Cat1 is a branch worthy of attention.

Judging from the current development trend of the cellular Internet of Things, the opportunity for LTE Cat1 to assume the main role of 4G Internet of Things connection has already begun.

 

Different levels of service capabilities complement the main scenarios of the Internet of Things

Unlike previous mobile communication technologies, 4G LTE does not provide all users with the same homogeneous services. LTE network operators will use various methods to hierarchically classify users and provide services with different network capabilities.

For example, according to the quality of service (QoS) agreement signed with users, operators will provide users with customized services, including guarantees such as bandwidth and access priority. The more familiar hierarchical and hierarchical services in the industry provide different service capabilities based on the level of terminal access capabilities, namely UE Category (User Terminal Level).

According to 3GPP related standards and specifications, the UE category is a collection of a series of variable wireless performance parameters in uplink/downlink, including many wireless characteristics, the most important of which is the rate supported by the user equipment

 

Generally speaking, the base station and the user terminal determine the transmission capability of the terminal through various parameters of the UE Category. The base station adjusts its own parameter settings according to the UE Category and communicates with the user terminal reasonably.

From this perspective, UE Category is also the basis for the design of various terminals of different levels in the industrial chain. Among them, Category 1 is the user terminal level of the lowest version of the parameter configuration, allowing the industry to design “low version” 4G terminals at low cost, generally referred to as LTE Cat1.

Of course, the “low version” 4G terminal LTE Cat1 also plays an important role in the industry. For example, some mobile phone manufacturers consider using LTE Cat1 chips to launch 4G elderly smartphones, because many elderly phones only require basic call and data functions.

LTE Cat1 supports VoLTE and low-rate data at a low cost, providing mobile phone manufacturers with a new choice. However, the significance of Cat 1 in the field of the Internet of Things may be more important. Practitioners in the Internet of Things industry should be familiar with a picture similar to the following:

 

This pyramid structure reveals the distribution of cellular IoT connections: 60% of IoT connections require narrowband networks to provide services, while low-to-medium-rate IoT devices require LTE Cat1 or eMTC networks to provide services, and only about 10% of high-speed services require 4G Cat. 4 or more or 5G eMBB provides services.

Looking back at our current cellular IoT industry ecology, it can be clearly seen that narrowband services and high-speed services have mature networks and industrial ecology, while the medium and low-speed IoT networks and related industry ecology, which account for 30%, are still relatively blank. Therefore, the development of the LTE Cat1 network and related industries are of great significance to complement the main scenarios of the Internet of Things.

Four perspectives to see the timing of the launch of Cat 1
In 2016, China Telecom released the commercial plan of Cat 1 and launched the Cat1 module subsidy program, but in the past few years, Cat 1 has not ushered in the expected large-scale connection. Of course, it may not be the best time then, and the entire industry has undergone many changes in the past few years. Is it a better time to promote Cat 1 again? We can examine it from four perspectives.

(1) Intergenerational migration of cellular Internet of Things connection mode has started

2019 is the first year of 5G, but for some time to come, the industry will still present a situation where the four generations of 2G/3G/4G/5G mobile communication networks coexist. This situation has caused great difficulties for infrastructure planning such as site sites and spectrum.

Therefore, the industry hopes that the old generation of networks can accelerate the frequency reduction and exit the network, leaving scarce resources to the new generation of networks.

The development of the cellular Internet of Things is to a large extent also affected by the intergenerational upgrade of mobile communication networks, opening the way for intergenerational migration of connection methods. According to data from Counterpoint, a market research organization, in the next few years, the number of cellular Internet of Things connections will experience a major migration from 2G+4G to NB-IoT+4G.

At the same time, two-module manufacturers, Youfang Technology and Fibocom, also launched module products equipped with Ivy 8910DM. Ziguang Zhanrui has a relatively high market scale in the 2G module field. Its platform covers almost all domestic mainstream module manufacturers.

It is easier for mainstream module manufacturers to further adopt the new Cat 1 platform of Ziguang Zhanrui to launch corresponding products. A scale effect is formed in a short time, and the module cost is promoted to a level that users can bear. Of course, what is certain is that with the entry of Ziguang Zhanrui and the expansion of Cat 1 scale, other manufacturers with 4G baseband design capabilities will also enter, further driving the cost reduction to the expected range.

 

  • Infrastructure readiness and new opportunities

 

As early as 2017, China Telecom announced that Cat 1 could be commercialized. Based on the existing 4G network, for each operator, Cat 1 does not require additional investment in the network, and it can be said that the infrastructure side is ready.

 

In the past few years, Chinese operators have built the world’s largest 4G network, and the network coverage is far ahead of overseas operators in terms of breadth and depth. According to the latest data from the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the total number of 4G base stations nationwide has reached 5.19 million by the end of September this year, accounting for 64.2% of all base stations.

The network infrastructure of this scale provides an environment that can be accessed anytime, anywhere for mobile communication users across the country. With the help of the 4G network infrastructure, Cat 1 can also provide IoT users with the opportunity to access anytime and anywhere. It can be said that its network infrastructure is not weaker than 2G/3G and NB-IoT, which is a migration to Cat 1 for IoT connections. Lay a good foundation.

 

However, in addition to the Cat 1 infrastructure is ready, the special domestic background makes Cat 1 face new opportunities. The author believes that this opportunity stems from the failure of MTC’s domestic progress to meet expectations.

 

Due to its 1Mbps rate, mobility support, VoLTE, and other characteristics, eMTC can undertake low-to-medium-rate 2G/3G Internet of Things connections, which can replace Cat1 to a certain extent. However, the development of domestic eMTC is facing difficulties from many aspects.

The author believes that the main ones include: investment, operators put more resources into 5G construction, and it is difficult to obtain capital budget for eMTC construction; industrial ecology, due to lack of infrastructure support In this regard, domestic participating manufacturers are very limited; in terms of application cases, they are mainly concentrated overseas, but these cases may not be able to be used for reference in China.

 

Due to various difficulties, the domestic industry has not high expectations for eMTC. There are not many alternatives for the connection scheme of the medium and low-rate cellular Internet of Things. In the end, Cat 1 may be the main choice, which is an opportunity for Cat 1 to develop rapidly.

 

(4) Motivation and determination of operators

 

The formation of industry trends, cost reduction, and network infrastructure is ready. These three conditions are not enough to drive the rapid development of Cat 1. We also need to look at the attitude of the dominant players in this game. The attitude of operators in this field is very important.

When operators have great motivation and determination, this industry will develop rapidly under other conditions.

 

In my opinion, different operators have different motivations and determinations. Let’s take China Mobile as an example for analysis.

 

In the past ten years, China Mobile has operated the world’s best 2G network. At present, although China Mobile’s strategic plan has not yet clarified the timetable for 2G withdrawal from the network, industry public opinion continues to increase the pressure on it to withdraw from the network. China Mobile hopes to see that the negative impact of this network’s withdrawal from service can be minimized.

 

According to public data, as of the end of June 2019, China Mobile has more than 690 million IoT connections. Most of the connections of this scale are still achieved through 2G. In 2018, China Mobile’s 2G IoT connections increased at a rate of 30 million per month.

Such a large scale and rapid growth actually put a heavy “baggage” on its back to a certain extent, making it increasingly difficult for IoT users to migrate between generations. From this perspective, because China Telecom and China Unicom have fewer 2G Internet of Things users and do not have much historical “baggage”, the resistance to 2G withdrawal from the network is very small.

 

When users have doubts about the risk of 2G withdrawal from the network, what new choices can be given to users? This is a question that China Mobile must carefully consider. In this context, Cat 1 network matures and products are launched, giving users a suitable choice. From this perspective, perhaps it has great motivation and determination to promote Cat 1.

 

On the other hand, what we see is the change in the revenue of operators in the Internet of Things, prompting them to have greater motivation for the migration of Internet of Things to Cat 1. Take China Mobile as an example. According to the interim financial report data, the “scissors gap” of China Mobile’s IoT business tends to close, that is, the gap between the growth rate of IoT connection and the growth rate of IoT revenue is narrowing.

 

In the past two years, the number of China Mobile’s IoT connections has maintained a growth rate far exceeding 100%, while the revenue growth rate has basically remained below 50%; but in the first half of 2019, China Mobile’s IoT revenue growth rate It remained in the range of 40%-50%, but the growth rate of the number of connections dropped below 80%, and both the decline in connection growth and the increase in revenue growth coexist.

It can be seen that the average income behind the Internet of Things connection is gradually increasing, and the ARPU value has increased. In the first half of 2019, the ARPU value of China Mobile’s Internet of Things industry was 1.25 yuan/month, which is less than the whole year of 2018. 1.14 yuan/month has begun to rise.

 

In order to ensure continued growth in the number of connections and revenue, it is necessary to increase the sales of more high-value products. Compared with the previous 2G and NB-IoT, Cat 1 as a 4G connection can increase the ARPU value and accelerate the closing of the “scissors gap”.

In the context of the State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission’s assessment of the high-quality development of central enterprises, improving the sales of high-value products has become an important means. From this perspective, operators have great motivation and determination to promote the migration of 2G/3G medium-rate services to Cat 1.

 

From the analysis of the above four angles, it can be seen that the launch of Cat 1 is a good time.

 

Product design and launch rhythm

However, the intergenerational migration of cellular Internet of Things connection also requires a process, and the design and launch of related products require detailed planning. Because it is facing low-to-medium-rate scenarios, especially some medium-rare applications, the environment faced by users is relatively complex, and more comprehensive consideration is required in product design.

 

For example, elevator media has certain requirements for data bandwidth but does not require high real-time data. Cat 1 can be used instead of Cat 4 to reduce media operator costs. However, elevator media screens sometimes increase the demand for audience interaction, such as In screen promotion advertisements such as Focus and Trends, viewers are often guided to turn on the Bluetooth of their mobile phones to send coupons.

For another example, all existing sharing formats such as shared bicycles all use cellular and Bluetooth connections as standard equipment. In these scenarios, if the IoT module can integrate Cat 1 and Bluetooth, it will accelerate customer product development.

 

According to public information, Ziguang Zhanrui Ivy 8910DM supports LTE Cat.1 BIS, GSM dual-mode, and integrates Bluetooth, Wi-Fi indoor positioning, and VoLTE. In the initial stage of commercial use, Cat 1 has fewer corresponding scenarios and cases, and some clear scenarios have diverse needs. Similar integrated product design, in the initial commercial stage of Cat 1, has good support for complex environment conditions in many medium-rate scenarios.

 

Of course, with the further development of the industry, when there are a large number of landing forms in Cat 1 related formats, and specific scenarios have large-scale requirements, at this time various customized single-mode products may enter the launch plans of various manufacturers.

 

Since low-to-medium-rate IoT connections are much higher than high-rate IoT connections, it can be predicted that in the future 4G IoT connection structure, Cat 1 will occupy the dominant position, higher than Cat 4 and above connections. At present, the commercial opportunity for Cat 1 has already begun. In the future, we look forward to the joint efforts of the industry to accelerate the intergenerational upgrade of IoT connections.

Please contact us for more details if you need them, or visit our HIFIVEE for our creative and innovative products.